Conventional Framing
Biological scale is often described in terms such as molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, organismal, ecological, and evolutionary.
These descriptions can be useful ways of locating phenomena across different spatial and temporal extents.
Difficulties arise when such descriptions are treated as if they identified a hierarchy of independently existing biological levels, each possessing its own intrinsic causal or explanatory priority.
APS distinguishes physical scale from Scale as an analytic projection.
The APS Perspective
In APS, Scale concerns where persistence is organised across spatial and temporal extents.
Living organisation is materially realised across different extents. Molecular interactions, cellular organisation, physiological processes, organismal activity, environmental relations, development, and evolutionary history may all be relevant to particular biological questions.
Scale does not divide this organisation into independent layers.
Instead, Scale asks which spatial and temporal extents, and which materially implemented relations among them, are relevant to explaining the persistence of the organisation under investigation.
Scale therefore concerns explanatory relevance across materially realised extents rather than size alone.
Physical Scale and Scale as Analytic Projection
APS distinguishes carefully between physical scale and Scale as an analytic projection.
Physical scale refers to the materially realised spatial and temporal extent of biological structures, activities, processes, and relations.
Scale as an analytic projection asks which of those extents, and which relations across them, are relevant to the explanatory problem at issue.
The analytic category therefore does not create the material organisation it investigates.
Nor does it imply that every biological explanation must traverse multiple scales.
The distinction is analytic; the spatial and temporal organisation to which it refers is materially real.
Scale and Organised Persistence
Scale is closely related to organised persistence.
Organised persistence concerns the continuity of living organisation despite change.
Scale concerns where that persistence is organised across spatial and temporal extents.
For some explanatory targets, persistence may be adequately explained through relatively local organisation. For others, relations extending across wider spatial or temporal extents may be relevant.
APS does not assume in advance that every explanation must traverse every scale.
The relevant extent is determined by the explanatory problem.
Scale within the APS Analytic Architecture
Within the APS analytic architecture, Scale is the analytic projection concerned with where persistence is organised across spatial and temporal extents.
It is one of three complementary analytic projections:
-
Agency concerns what living systems do;
-
Process concerns how continuity is maintained despite change;
-
Scale concerns where persistence is organised across spatial and temporal extents.
Agency, Process, and Scale are analytic projections of one viability-oriented, constraint-closed organisation. They are not independent components, causes, entities, domains, or hierarchical levels of biological reality.
Analytic differentiation does not imply ontological separation.
Scale Is Not Hierarchy
Scale should not be confused with hierarchy.
APS does not treat molecular, cellular, physiological, organismal, ecological, or evolutionary descriptions as a ladder of increasingly important biological realities.
Nor does it assume that causation belongs intrinsically to one privileged scale.
Where wider organisation alters local activity, this must occur through materially implemented conditions, interactions, or constraints.
Likewise, local activity can contribute to wider organisation only through materially realised relations.
APS therefore avoids treating phrases such as top-down causation or bottom-up causation as explanations in themselves.
Such language can describe a relation, but the relevant biological explanation requires specification of the material processes and constraints through which that relation is realised.
No scale possesses intrinsic explanatory priority merely because it is spatially larger, smaller, temporally longer, or shorter.
Scale and Resolution
Scale should also be distinguished from resolution.
Scale concerns the spatial and temporal extent of materially realised organisation.
Resolution concerns the granularity at which that organisation is represented or investigated.
The same biological organisation may be examined at different resolutions without changing its physical scale.
Conversely, an explanation may involve materially distinct spatial or temporal extents while describing each at similar levels of resolution.
Conflating scale with resolution can therefore create the impression of ontological levels where only differences in descriptive granularity are present.
Scale-Coupled Organisation
APS uses the idea of scale-coupled organisation only where processes occurring across different spatial or temporal extents are materially connected through relations relevant to the explanatory target.
Such coupling does not imply causal traffic between abstract levels.
It requires identifiable interactions, constraints, or material dependencies through which activity at one extent alters conditions relevant to activity at another.
Scale-coupling should therefore not be inferred merely because two descriptions concern different physical scales.
The relevant relations must be materially specified.
Scale and Viability
Viability concerns conditions compatible with the continued functioning and organised persistence of living organisation.
Scale asks across which spatial and temporal extents the conditions relevant to that persistence are organised.
For some systems, viability-relevant organisation may be relatively local. In other cases, environmental, developmental, physiological, or historical relations extending across wider extents may be relevant.
Their relevance must be established from the biological organisation under investigation rather than inferred merely from their representation within APS.
Scale and Biological Agency
Agency and Scale answer different questions about the same living organisation.
Agency concerns viability-oriented organisational activity.
Scale concerns where the organisation relevant to persistence is materially realised across spatial and temporal extents.
Agency should therefore not be attributed indiscriminately to every structure or process occurring across those extents.
The relevant question is which organisation constitutes the agent and where the activities, constraints, and conditions relevant to its viability are materially implemented.
Agency and Scale are analytically distinguishable without constituting separate biological systems.
Scale and Process
Process and Scale must also be distinguished carefully.
Process concerns how continuity is maintained despite change.
Scale concerns where that continuity is organised across spatial and temporal extents.
Processes may unfold across different physical scales and timescales, but Process is not simply temporal scale.
Likewise, Scale does not describe change itself.
It identifies the extents and relations relevant to explaining how persistence is materially organised.
Process and Scale are therefore complementary analytic projections rather than independent components of living organisation.
Scale and Mechanism
Mechanistic explanations often focus on relatively bounded sets of components, activities, and causal relations.
APS does not regard such explanations as incomplete merely because they do not integrate multiple scales.
Where the explanatory target can be adequately addressed through a local mechanism, no additional multiscale account is required.
Scale becomes relevant when the organisation necessary to explain the target extends beyond the boundaries of that mechanism or when materially implemented relations across spatial or temporal extents alter the conditions under which the mechanism operates.
Whether doing so provides explanatory gain must be established relative to the explanatory target and the strongest established explanation.
Scale, Development, Adaptation, and Evolution
Development, adaptation, and evolution involve organisation across different temporal and sometimes spatial extents.
APS can use Scale to ask which of those extents are relevant to a particular explanatory target.
This does not imply that development, adaptation, and evolution are manifestations of a single scale-coupled process.
Nor does it require established developmental, adaptive, or evolutionary explanations to be reconstructed through APS.
Scale provides an analytic perspective on where relevant organisation is materially realised. It does not itself supply developmental mechanisms, evolutionary history, or adaptive explanation.
Scale and Explanatory Perspective
Scale directs attention toward spatial and temporal extent without making multiscale explanation mandatory.
Structural, mechanistic, physiological, developmental, ecological, evolutionary, mathematical, and other explanations may each answer legitimate biological questions at the extents relevant to their targets.
APS does not require every explanation to include multiple spatial or temporal extents.
Scale becomes analytically useful where identifying relations across such extents clarifies how persistence is organised.
Scale and Explanatory Priority
No spatial or temporal scale possesses intrinsic explanatory priority within APS.
The appropriate explanatory focus depends on the target.
A molecular mechanism may be sufficient for one question. Physiological organisation may be required for another. Developmental history, ecological context, or evolutionary history may become relevant where the target depends upon them.
Explanatory priority is therefore question-relative.
APS contributes only where relating organisation across spatial or temporal extents makes explanatorily relevant relations available beyond those supplied by the strongest established explanation for the target.
Summary
In APS, Scale concerns where persistence is organised across spatial and temporal extents.
Scale is:
-
distinct from physical size alone;
-
distinct from descriptive resolution;
-
distinct from hierarchy;
-
distinct from Process;
-
concerned with materially implemented relations across spatial and temporal extents;
-
without intrinsic explanatory priority.
Physical scale belongs to the biological organisation itself.
Scale, in the APS sense, is an analytic projection used to investigate which spatial and temporal extents and relations are relevant to a particular explanatory target.
Agency, Process, and Scale are complementary, target-sensitive analytic projections of one viability-oriented, constraint-closed organisation.
Key Point
Physical scale belongs to the materially realised organisation. Scale, in the APS sense, is the analytic projection that asks which spatial and temporal extents, and which relations across them, are relevant to explaining how persistence is organised. It is not a hierarchy of biological levels or an independently existing dimension of Life.