Understanding the APS Glossary

The APS glossary is more than an alphabetical collection of biological definitions. It presents an interconnected system of concepts intended to make important relationships within and across biological disciplines more explicit. For example, biological function is considered in relation to viability, agency, adaptation, normativity and cognition. These concepts are not independent: clarifying or revising one may have implications for how others are understood.

The glossary therefore provides an accessible entry point to the explanatory architecture of APS — the relationships among biological concepts, explanatory dependencies and disciplinary perspectives. It seeks to make these connections visible without reducing the diversity of biological explanations to a single model.

Developed through philosophical analysis and systematic conceptual investigation, with AI assistance, this architecture is itself a subject of continuing research. Its coherence and breadth can be examined, but its scientific usefulness, accessibility and comparative advantages remain open questions. In particular, does making conceptual relationships explicit help readers understand and navigate biological explanations, and how does this approach compare with established alternatives?

An Example of Conceptual Relationships

APS distinguishes biological agency from cognition. Biological agency concerns viability-oriented organisational activity, while cognition involves the additional organisation of biological significance across time. On this account, living activity does not automatically qualify as cognitive.

Readers can examine these definitions, follow the reasoning behind the distinction, and consider its limitations. This illustrates how the glossary connects concepts while preserving important differences between them. It presents an APS philosophical proposal, not proof that its account of cognition is uniquely correct or scientifically superior.